Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans (DFSP): |
Introduction
Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare dermal tumor (comprising approximately 1% of soft tissue sarcomas) with typically indolent growth over years and a probability of regional/distant metastases of less than 2-3%.1,2 The disease most commonly affects adults aged 20-50 years. The estimated incidence of DFSP is 3 to 4.2 cases per million people per year, with equal sexual distribution.3,4 In DFSP harboring areas of high-grade fibrosarcoma (called fibrosarcomatous DFSP or DFSP-FS) metastases develop in the range of 8-15%,5,7 which is evidence of its more aggressive behavior. Distant metastases are usually localized in the lungs and less commonly in the lymph nodes. The standard treatment of this cutaneous sarcoma is radical, wide local excision; however a high rate of local control is also reported with the application of Mohs micrographic surgery.8 Since achieving negative margins is critical to prevent local relapse, the recommended margin of surgical excision is usually above 2 cm.1 Radical surgery often requires the use of reconstructive techniques and may result in cosmetic disfigurement or functional impairment. Such mutilating procedures might be avoided if appropriate Mohs micrographic surgery can be applied.9 If radical resection is not feasible, radiotherapy may be applied to reduce the risk of local recurrence. The dose of radiotherapy varies within the range of 50-70 Gy.10 Overall, local recurrences have been reported in the range of 24-90%.1,11
![]() |
Molecular Biology
Almost all cases of DFSP are characterized by the distinctive reciprocal rearrangement of chromosomes 17 and 22 in the form of translocation t(17;22)(q22;q13) and often a supernumerary ring chromosome.12-16 This rearrangement results in the fusion of collagen type I a1 chain gene (COL1A1) to the platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) B-chain gene (PDGFB). This COL1A1-PDGFB fusion may be identified in virtually all DFSP cases by sensitive molecular diagnostic tests: the fluorescence in-situ (FISH) method or multiplex reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), which is extremely important for differential diagnosis of atypical, metastatic DFSP or DFSP-FS.17,18 The consequences of these molecular events include the deregulation of PDGFB chain expression, the unscheduled expression of COL1A1/PDGFB fusion protein processing to mature homodimer PDGF-BB, and the continuous autocrine activation of PDGFR receptor B (PDGFRB), which is protein tyrosine kinase acting as a potent growth factor.19-21 The rearranged PDGF gene leads to the production of functional platelet-derived growth factor that can bind to and activate platelet-derived growth factor receptors on tumor cells, providing an autocrine and/or paracrine mitogenic stimulus, leading to malignant transformation.22 In some cases of DFSP with no evidence of the 17;22 chromosomal translocation, other molecular abnormalities were shown, such as t(5;8).23
FISH: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a laboratory technique used to detect a specific segment of DNA and its copies in a cell. The method can also identify structurally abnormal chromosomes. Specific segment of DNA is chemically modified and labeled in the laboratory so that it will become fluorescent under a special microscope. This DNA serves as a probe that can find matching segments of DNA.
Clinical Results
Advances in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms of DFSP have resulted in the introduction of targeted therapy acting on PDGFR to clinical practice. Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor specifically directed toward BCR/ABL, KIT, FMS (the receptor for Colony Stimulating Factor 1), ARG (ABL-related gene) and PDGFR alpha and beta. It is an effective systemic therapy in most cases of DFSP. Imatinib competes with the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) molecule, blocking the tyrosine kinase receptor’s ability for autophosporylation, which results in inhibition of the damaged pathway of signal transduction and restoration of proper intracellular signaling.
Imatinib: A small molecule inhibitor that targets several tyrosine kinases including the Abelson leukemia (ABL) kinase, KIT, PDGFR, ARG and FMS. It is used to treat patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia, gastrointestinal stromal tumors and myeloproliferative diseases with translocations involving PRGFR genes. Imatinib mesylate (Glivec®) is administered orally, and the dose of 400-800 mg daily is recommended.
The observation that autocrine overproduction of PDGFB from gene rearrangement is a key pathogenetic factor19,20 and provoked the in vitro research, which showed inhibition of DFSP cell growth after exposure to imatinib mesylate.22,24 The further demonstration of the inhibitory effect of imatinib on six different DFSP cell lines in vitro and in vivo25 led to the investigation of this new therapeutic approach in the clinic. The first reports on six patients suggested the usefulness of imatinib in metastatic and locally advanced DFSP.26-31 The next series of ten patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic DFSP treated in the Imatinib Target Exploration Consortium Study B2225 showed 100% response rate (50% were complete responses) in locally advanced cases and one partial response lasting seven months in the metastatic setting.32 These observations resulted in imatinib’s registration as the therapy of choice in inoperable and/or metastatic DFSP. In a phase II trial33 evaluating the activity of imatinib in life-threatening malignancies expressing imatinib-sensitive tyrosine kinase, DFSP was the only one out of five tumor types where notable activity was shown with extensive regression in ten of twelve cases (50% partial remissions, 33.3% complete remissions).
Combined analysis of two prematurely closed phase II, single arm, open-label trials (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer no. 62027 and the Southwest Oncology Group no. S0345) regarding the efficacy of imatinib in advanced (inoperable and/or metastatic) DFSP has demonstrated a clinical benefit rate exceeding 70% for twenty-five patients with advanced DFSP, with median time to progression of 1.7 years.34 Another study35 on fifteen patients who did not qualify for clinical trials has proven the striking activity of imatinib mesylate in advanced DFSP, with clinical benefit rate approaching 80% as well as median Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) were not reached. It has been shown that DFSP-FS is also sensitive to imatinib, although responses seem to be shorter in duration.36 DFSP-FS tumors lacking the 17;22 chromosomal translocation32 do not respond to imatinib. The presence of a molecular target (COL1A1-PDGFB) is obligatory to confirm diagnosis of DFSP in every case prior to the start of imatinib therapy.
Given the fact that complete, wide surgical excision is the standard treatment in localized resectable DFSP cases, neoadjuvant imatinib therapy leading to tumor downstaging and less cosmetic disfigurement, functional impairment and excision morbidity appears very attractive. Lebbe et al.37 presented a preliminary report on twenty-five resectable DFSP (median size – 4.5 cm) treated in a phase II trial with preoperative imatinib at the dose of 600 mg. daily. Objective partial response according to RECIST was observed in nine cases (36%). Present results indicate that some DFSP cases initially evaluated as unresectable/metastatic or necessitating disfiguring surgery were evaluated as resectable after imatinib therapy. This rational approach leading to complete remission may be potentially curative, although longer follow-up is needed. Further studies are necessary for elucidating whether preoperative imatinib therapy reduces the need for wide surgical margins or whether imatinib has activity as adjuvant therapy in cases of positive margins after excision or in other high-risk patients.
The dose of imatinib used in mentioned studies ranged from 400 to 800 mg. daily. Available clinical data are not sufficient to determine the optimal dose of initial imatinib treatment, since objective responses were observed both with lower and higher dosing schedules.
The majority of patients treated with imatinib experience side effects during treatment, but almost all are mild and manageable; the most common being fluid retention/edema, anemia, fatigue, nausea, skin rash, thrombocytopenia, vomiting, neutropenia and diarrhea.33
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Future Directions
There is still uncertainty concerning the mechanisms of imatinib action and resistance in the treatment of DFSP, as well as a need to identify novel molecular markers predicting response to such therapy. It was presumed that imatinib’s effect resulted from the inhibition of phosphorylation of PDGFR. Unexpectedly, the clinical activity of imatinib is striking even in DFSP that expresses a relatively low amount of activated PDGFRB. If tumor cells are dependent on that signaling mechanism, it seems that the inhibition of low-level receptor tyrosine kinases may still be clinically effective.
Summary
Imatinib is currently the gold standard therapy of inoperable, metastatic, or recurrent cases of DFSP. Such treatment may potentially facilitate resection or decrease disfigurement related to an extensive surgical procedure. A significant percentage of patients may be rendered free of disease by excision of residual disease following partial response on imatinib. Current therapy of DFSP with the 17;22 chromosomal translocation should be definitively conducted by a multidisciplinary team, including an oncological surgeon. The use of imatinib mesylate as initial therapy to decrease the extent of wide surgical resection and related morbidity should be always considered.
References and Bibliography
1. Chang CK, Jacobs IA, Salti GI. Outcomes of surgery for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004; 30:341-345.
2. Laskin WB. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Ca Cancer J Clin 1992; 42:116-125.
3. Simon MP, Pedeutour F, Sirvent N, et al. Deregulation of the platelet-derived growth factor B-chain gene via fusion with collagen gene COL1A1 in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and giant-cell fibroblastoma. Nat Genet 1997; 15(1):95-98.
4. Monnier D, Vidal C, Martin L, et al. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a population-based cancer registry descriptive study of 66 consecutive cases diagnosed between 1982 and 2002. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2006; 20(10):1237-42.
5. Bowne WB, Antonescu CR, Leung DHY, et al. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. A clinicopathological analysis of patients treated and followed at a single institution. Cancer 2000; 88:2711-2720.
6. Mentzel T, Beham A, Katenkamp D, et al. Fibrosarcomatous ‘high-grade’ dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study of 41 cases with emphasis on prognostic significance. Am J Surg Pathol 1998; 22:576-587.
7. Lal P, Sharma R, Mohan H, Sekhon MS. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans metastasizing to lymph nodes: a case report and review of literature. J Surg Oncol 1999; 72:178-180.
8. Meguerditchian AN, Wang J, Lema B, et al. Wide excision or Mohs micrographic surgery for the treatment of primary dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Am J Clin Oncol 2010; 33(3):300-303.
9. A. Stojadinovic, H. M. Karpoff, C. R. Antonescu, et al. “Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the head and neck,” Annals of Surgical Oncology 2000; 7:696-704.
10. Dagan R, Morris CG, Zlotecki RA, Scarborough MT, Mendenhall WM. Radiotherapy in the treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Am J Clin Oncol 2005; 28(6):537-9.
11. S. Ten Heuvel, A. Suurmeijer, E. Pras, R. J. Van Ginkel, H. J. Hoekstra, “Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: Recurrence is related to the adequacy of surgical margins,” European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2010; 36:89-94.
12. Pédeutour F, Coindre J-M, Sozzi G, et al. Supernumerary ring chromosomes containing chromosome 17 sequences: a specific feature of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans? Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1994; 76:1–9.
13. Pédeutour F, Simon MP, Minoletti F, et al. Translocation, t(17;22)(q22;q13), in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a new tumor-associated chromosome rearrangement. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1996; 72: 171-4.
14. Sandberg AA, Bridge JA. Updates on the cytogenetics and molecular genetics of bone and soft tissue tumors: dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and giant cell fibroblastoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2003; 140: 1-12.
15. Simon M-P, Navarro M, Roux D, Pouysségur J. Structural and functional analysis of a chimeric protein COL1A1-PDGFB generated by the translocation t(17;22)(q22;q13.1) in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DP). Oncogene 2001; 20: 2965-75.
16. Patel KU, Szabo SS, Hernandez VS, et al. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans COL1A1-PDGFB fusion is identified in virtually all dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans cases when investigated by newly developed multiplex reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and fluorescence in situ hybridization assays. Hum Pathol 2008; 39, 184–193.
17. Kerob D, Pedeutour F, Leboeuf C, et al. Value of Cytogenetic Analysis in the Treatment of Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:1757-9.
18. Wang J, Morimutsu Y, Okamoto S et al: COL1A1-PDGFB fusion transcript in fibrosarcomatous areas of six dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J Mol Diag 2000; 2: 47-52.
19. Shimizu A, O’Brien KP, Sjöblom T, et al. The dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans-associated collagen type I_1/platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) B-chain fusion gene generates a transforming protein that is processed to functional PDGFBB. Cancer Res 1999; 59:3719-3723.
20. Simon M-P, Navarro M, Roux D, et al. Transforming properties of chimerical protein COL1A1-PDGFB generated by dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans-associated translocation t(17;22)(q22;q13.1). Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2001;128: 82.
21. McArthur G. Molecularly targeted treatment for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Semin Oncol 2004; 31: 30-36.
22. Greco A, Fusetti L, Villa R, et al: Transforming activity of the chimeric sequence formed by the fusion of collagen gene COL1A1 and the platelet derived growth factor b-chain gene in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Oncogene 1998; 17:1313-1319.
23. Bianchini L, Maire G, Guillot B, et al. Complex t(5;8) involving the CSPG2 and PTK2B genes in a case of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans without the COL1A1-PDGFB fusion. Virchows Arch 2008; 452(6):689-96.
24. Sjoblom T, Shimizu A, O’Brien KP, et al. Growth inhibition of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans tumors by the platelet-derived growth factor receptor antagonist STI571 through induction of apoptosis. Cancer Res 2001; 61: 5778–5783.
25. Greco A, Roccato E, Miranda C, et al: Growth-inhibitory effect of STI571 on cells transformed by the COL1A1/PDGF-beta rearrangement. Int J Cancer 2001; 92:354-60.
26. Maki RG, Awan RA, Dixon RH, et al. Differential sensitivity to imatinib of 2 patients with metastatic sarcoma arising from dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Int J Cancer 2002; 100: 623-6.
27. Rubin BP, Schuetze SM, Eary JF, et al. Molecular targeting of platelet-derived growth factor B by imatinib mesylate in a patient with metastatic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 3586-3591.
28. Pedeutour F, Coindre JM, Nicolo G, et al. Response of metastatic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans to imatinib mesylate. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003 ; 23(abstr 3334).
29. Ruka W, Falkowski S, Wudarska J, et al.. The partial response of lung metastases arising from dermatofibrosarcoma after one month of imatinib therapy – a case report. Nowotwory – Journal of Oncology 2003; 53:165-168.
30. Labropoulos SV, Fletcher JA, Oliveira AM, et al. Sustained complete remission of metastatic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with imatinib mesylate. Anticancer Drugs 2005; 16: 461-6.
31. Mizutani K, Tamada Y, Hara K, et al. Imatinib mesylate inhibits the growth of metastatic lung lesions in a patient with dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Br J Dermatol 2004; 151: 235-7.
32. McArthur GA, Demetri GD, van Oosterom AT, et al. Molecular and clinical analysis of locally advanced dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans treated with imatinib: Imatinib Target Exploration Consortium Study B2225. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 866-873.
33. Heinrich MC, Joensuu H, Demetri GD, et al. Phase II, open-label study evaluating the activity of imatinib in treating life-threatening malignancies known to be associated with imatinib-sensitive tyrosine kinases. Clin Cancer Res 2008; 14, 2717-25.
34. Rutkowski P, Van Glabbeke M, Rankin CJ, et al. Imatinib mesylate in advanced dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP): pooled analysis of two phase II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 1772-1779.
35. Rutkowski P, Dębiec-Rychter M, Nowecki ZI, Michej W, Symonides M, Ptaszynski K, Ruka W. Treatment of advanced dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with imatinib mesylate with or without surgical resection. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010 Jun 21. [Epub ahead of print]
36. Gronchi A, Stacchiotti S, Pedeutour F, et al. Response to imatinib mesylate (IM) in fibrosarcoma (FS) arising in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP). J Clin Oncol 2008; 26, (suppl; abstr 10593).
37. Lebbé C, Kerob D, Porcher R et al:. Imatinib mesylate as a preoperative therapy in dermatofibrosarcoma: Results of a multicentric phase II study on 25 patients. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 18s, (suppl; abstr 10032).
V8N3 ESUN Copyright © 2011 Liddy Shriver Sarcoma Initiative.







